Zotac

If you ever wanted small form factor, then Zotac has always been an option, sprouting mITX products for every platform and chipset.  With Ivy Bridge and 7-series platforms, Zotac has announced three products so far – two H77 motherboards (-A-E and -B-E), and this motherboard, the Z77-ITX WiFi (also known as the Z77-A-E). 

Historically Zotac has not had the ability to innovate as much as the key players in the motherboard industry.  Part of this is down to the 'real estate on the PCB of a mITX' factor – the chipset specification deals with a significant amount of the actual hardware on board, but part of it is also due to the size of the company in correlation to their R&D.  In this context Zotac fit in the same niche as Biostar – whatever we do see in terms of innovation is few and far between.   However every now and again we are pleasantly surprised, as long as it fits into the correct price bracket.

With that, let us start with the Z77-ITX WiFi.

Zotac Z77-ITX WIFI Overview

When testing the Zotac Z77-ITX, I initially ran through the benchmark suite with a high end i7-3770K, and again recently with an i3-3225.  In terms of performance, there were several key factors worth noting, such as the slightly slower times in our WinRAR testing compared to other Z77 products.  This test relies on the motherboard to apply turbo multipliers given varied load – it is a test that top tier manufacturers seem to do well in, but the lesser manufacturers fall behind.  On the plus side, we get a fast POST time (9.18 seconds with a discrete GPU installed), low power usage (20W long idle on a 500W Platinum PSU with a discrete GPU installed, 32W idle) and a sub-200 microsecond DPC Latency test.

Hardware wise, Zotac take a different tack to the video outputs compared to the rest of the Z77 crowd.  The Z77 platform with an Ivy Bridge processor allows for 3 digital display outputs and one analogue; most motherboard vendors take this to mean ‘we want one of each output’.  Zotac, like Gigabyte, decided to make two of these outputs HDMI to cater for the majority of dual screen home setups (or to supply audio out of one and video out of the other).  Rather than give a combination DVI-I port, Zotac also equipped the board with a mDP port and placed in the package a mDP to DP adaptor.  If you want a modern digital connection from a Z77 mITX board, Zotac has you covered.

Also relating to hardware, Zotac have given this board a dual NIC as well as WiFi on board, giving network connectivity a high priority.  On the downside, we only get a Realtek ALC889, which also failed our RMAA 192 kHz test.   The USB 2.0 copy times were quite low, but improved while the CPU was under load, suggesting that some of the BIOS default options are not optimal for USB transfer.  The big BIOS option faux pas however is the reluctance for Zotac to move into 2012 and enable AHCI on their SATA ports by default.  Also, if you were looking for software for OC or fan control software, unfortunately you will not find them on a Zotac board.

The Zotac Z77-ITX is currently fluctuating wildly in price.  When I started the testing for this review, it was at $130.  I now see it on Newegg for $163.  For the former, it warrants a consideration when weighing up the pros and cons between which Z77 mITX motherboard to choose – having all those extras in the box helps sweeten the deal if you can overlook some of the possible issues.

Visual Inspection

As one of the first Z77 ITX motherboard on the test bed, it is hard not to notice the arrangement of the motherboard as a whole.  The location of the socket is very close to the PCIe connector – with the limitations of the mITX platform, the Intel minimum specified distance of components away from the socket (marked by the white box around the socket) is adhered to but only just.  This comes into play when we deal with different air coolers on such a platform.

Typically with a Z77 motherboard we see the chipset and additional IO chips to the south of the memory slots, but there is no such luxury on the Zotac Z77-ITX WiFi – we have the chipset located above the CPU, along with our SATA connectivity.  In terms of SATA ports, Zotac uses the two SATA 6 Gbps and two SATA 3 Gbps from the chipset for direct SATA connections – another of the SATA 3 Gbps from the chipset is used for the mSATA port to the right of the SATA ports.  This should leave one more for an eSATA port on the back IO, but we find no eSATA port.

Fan headers on board are oddly positioned – with a mITX platform I would expect at least two, if not three, and we get two 4-pin headers here.  We find a CPU header on the right hand side below the 24-pin ATX power connector and a 4-pin SYS header between the chipset heatsink and the SATA ports.  A lot of the space on the right hand side is taken up by the full length DDR3 memory slots – in the past we have seen Zotac switch them out for SO-DIMM memory ports, which could always be an idea for this platform (or if possible, angled SO-DIMM on the back of the board (?)).

The heatsink arrangement for the Zotac covers the chipset above the socket, and the VRM.  Zotac have decided to extend the heatsink over the IO panel due to their back panel port arrangement.  Even with the fan headers, this should help with cooling if the system were to be pushed with a high wattage chip and an overclock.

The location of the 8-pin CPU power connector is a little odd – we find it on the bottom of the board below the heatsink for the power delivery.  This means that any power supply would need to reach over parts of the board in order to connect in.  Zotac get around this by including an 8-pin CPU power extension cable in the box, but that still leaves the fact that a cable is somewhere potentially blocking airflow.

Other features directly visible on the board are the mSATA port and the WiFi module, both located above the CPU socket and to the right.  The WiFi card is perpendicular to the board itself, and runs two small cables to antenna ports on the back panel – I personally found these cables a little annoying when trying to plug peripherals in to the ports when the board was fixed in a case.

The mSATA port is something that will crop up on mITX boards from now on, providing the possibility of running a smaller form factor if you want to pick up an mSATA SSD.  As mSATA densities get higher, this will become more viable for Windows users (where Windows 7 x64 Ultimate requires a drive more than 32GB).

Also on board are various headers for the front panel, the front panel audio, two USB 2.0 headers, a USB 3.0 header (found near the IO), a two-digit debug LED and power and reset buttons.  The location of the USB 3.0 header is strange, as in a mITX platform it would more likely be for a front case connector or a separate USB 3.0 panel.  It is nice to see a debug LED on board however – I did have to use it a couple of times to determine why the board was failing to boot.

On the back panel, the IO is slightly odd compared to other Z77 motherboards we have encountered.  First up is a block of four USB 2.0 ports (I like blocks like this as it gets a lot of USB connectivity sorted), a pair of antenna slots, a ClearCMOS button, a PS/2 combination port, two USB 3.0, dual Realtek NIC, dual HDMI, mini-DP, optical S/PDIF output and audio jacks.  The dual HDMI is an interesting addition, as it involves in internal conversion from the DVI port to a HDMI.  I wonder if there is scope for this on more mainstream Z77 motherboards, whereby video output is organized in a single IO stack of HDMI, mDP/DP, HDMI.  Given our past reviews, the Gigabyte H77-ITX certainly has an inkling with their dual HDMI setup.

Board Features

Zotac Z77-ITX
Price Link
Size Mini ITX
CPU Interface LGA-1155
Chipset Intel Z77
Memory Slots Two DDR3 DIMM slots supporting up to 16 GB
Up to Dual Channel, 1066-2133 MHz
Video Outputs 2 x HDMI
mDP
Onboard LAN 2 x Realtek 8111E
1 x WiFi Module
Onboard Audio Reaktek ALC889
Expansion Slots 1 x PCIe 3.0 x16
1 x mSATA
1 x mini-PCIe (occupied by WiFi module)
Onboard SATA/RAID 2 x SATA 6 Gbps, Supporting RAID 0, 1, 5, 10
2 x SATA 3 Gbps, Supporting RAID 0, 1, 5, 10
1 x mSATA / mini-PCIe
USB 4 x USB 3.0 (Chipset) [2 back panel, 2 onboard]
8 x USB 2.0 (Chipset) [4 back panel, 4 onboard]
Onboard 2 x SATA 6 Gbps
2 x SATA 3 Gbps
1 x USB 3.0 Header
2 x USB 2.0 Headers
2 x Fan Headers
1 x mSATA / mini-PCIe
1 x Front Panel Audio
Power/Reset Buttons
Two-Digit LED Debug
Power Connectors 1 x 24-pin ATX Power Connector
1 x 8-pin CPU Power Connector
Fan Headers 1 x PWR (4-pin)
1 x SYS (4-pin)
IO Panel 4 x USB 2.0
2 x Antenna
1 x Clear CMOS
1 x PS/2 Combination Port
2 x USB 3.0
2 x Realtek 8111E GbE
2 x HDMI
1 x mDP
1 x Optical SPDIF Output
Audio Jacks
Warranty Period 3 Years
Product Page Link

On the pure hardware side, apart from the arrangement of the socket area, we could call Zotac out on one or two design issues.  The lack of an analogue output, even in the modern era, could be an oversight – this all comes down to the design of the package.  We also only have the Realtek ALC889 audio codec, rather than the ALC89x series, and for some reason it fails the RMAA 192 kHz test.  It is worthy of note however to mention the dual NIC + WiFi which is rare on a mITX board, as well as the presence of power/reset buttons in conjunction with a two-digit debug LED, useful for troubleshooting.

MSI Z77IA-E53 In The Box, Software Zotac Z77-ITX BIOS
Comments Locked

54 Comments

View All Comments

  • mike_b - Monday, December 31, 2012 - link

    Interesting article, but I have to ask why would someone spend more for a Z77 chipset when using 'just' an i3? Surely a much cheaper H61 chipset could do the job admirably, and at much lower cost.

    Z77 makes sense if you're overclocking, which is excluded from this test...
  • IanCutress - Monday, December 31, 2012 - link

    H61 has no chipset USB 3.0, no chipset SATA 6 Gbps, and you are limited to PCIe 2.0. H61 is also technically limited to one single sided DIMM per channel, and no SATA RAID. There's also SRT to consider, that would be advantageous with the ASRock and the mSATA on the rear.

    Ian
  • mike_b - Monday, December 31, 2012 - link

    It might make an interesting comparison to see what net advantage is gained with the added features of the Z77 chipset compared with the H61. If budgets are limited the ~100 dollar cost difference between the Z77 and H61 mainboards makes a big difference; that money saved could be put into something which makes more of a performance difference (SSD rather than HDD for example).

    Anandtech is one of the best tech sites around, you guys do a great job. I do sometimes see though an emphasis on more expensive products when in terms of real-world performance you could get almost the same thing at a much cheaper price. Might be worth mentioning somewhere.

    Not least because with yet another new socket coming with Haswell all these 1155 boards will be seen as out of date soon anyway.
  • IanCutress - Monday, December 31, 2012 - link

    Once we get into the swing with Haswell, we will hopefully covering the whole spectrum. Though it is worth noting that motherboard manufacturers, want to put their best foot forward, and would prefer their halo/channel boards get covered before their OEM / low end offerings. Hence this is why you rarely see many mainstream reviews that are not from forums dedicated to the market segment and users testing their own equipment. We are hoping to rectify the balance in due course. If there are any specific products you might want us to test or examine, drop me an email and I'll see what I can put in my schedule (as full as it is[!]) :)

    Ian
  • StormyParis - Monday, December 31, 2012 - link

    This is a major issue, not limited to motherboards: whenever I'm looking for something middle of the road or outright cheap, I can't find reviews.

    These Z77 MBs are a nice example: even though I'm recommending/building PCs regularly, most of them mini-ITX, I never came across a use case for Z77. Nobody apart from teens that still have something to prove overclocks anymore. People who want to do multi-GPU get a big case, and a big board. Are we supposed the extrapolate that the makers of good Z77 boards also make good H77 and H61 boards ?

    I understand you've got to make do with what you're given by the OEMs. And that reviews was very good, as usual. Pity it is irrelevant ?
  • Tech-Curious - Monday, December 31, 2012 - link

    That's an interesting observation. I have to say, I never noticed a significant lack of coverage for low-to-mid-range components (either in general or on Anandtech in particular), until this Fall, when I was in the market for a lower end motherboard.

    I guess I just always gravitated to higher end mobos before. Or maybe the coverage for such products was more comprehensive years ago. My memory's foggy, so it's hard to say.

    In any case, motherboards appear to be the exception. If anything, I think the internet has generally grown more bullish on low-to-mid-range CPUs and GPUs in recent years (probably, in part, as a result of the stagnating console situation, which results in stagnating system requirements for games).

    But all of that rambling aside, yeah. It'd be nice to see more diverse motherboard analysis. When I bought a b75 a couple of months ago, I literally couldn't find a review for that chipset. It wasn't a big deal; it's not like b75's features are any great mystery, after all -- but it is a little nettlesome to trip over sixty bajillion z77 reviews when there's nary peep about any other chipset.

    In other news, Ian's review is a good one -- and given that I've been a faithful user of Asus motherboards for the last 15 years, it's nice to see them take home the prize. :)
  • Etern205 - Saturday, January 5, 2013 - link

    My guess would be, why review a cheap board when majority of the readers here won't even bother buying it?
    And as for Asus boards, I've heard, they do something called based-line features. This means all boards from the bottom of the range to the top (Intel B75-Z77) will have the same base-line features, other features are just added like BT, WiFi, extra lan, etc.
  • Tech-Curious - Wednesday, January 9, 2013 - link

    Yes, I think the issue is that (at least with respect to Intel chipsets) low-end motherboards don't support overclocking. So they're both less interesting to review (fewer measurable differences in performance among different models), and they're less appealing to the presumed audience of sites like Anandtech.

    Still, the B75 is a perfectly good chipset. If you aren't heavily invested in overclocking, z77's advantages are likely wasted on you. Personally, I'm well beyond my overclocking days; I just don't have the time or the patience to go through the almost endless tuning process anymore. (Even if you find a stable OC at the outset, it can become unstable later, and/or a given application might expose instability that stress testing didn't, weeks or even months down the road).
  • jonjonjonj - Friday, January 4, 2013 - link

    just cause you don't overclock doesn't mean other people don't. why wouldn't you? because you want to get the fastest cpu that you can afford means you have something to prove? some people are just idiots.
  • Zap - Monday, December 31, 2012 - link

    But there isn't a $100 difference between H61 and Z77. There is a cheaper Gigabyte Z77 ITX board that's only around $60 more than the cheapest H61 ITX board, and it was even on sale recently for another $13 off making it less than $50 difference.

    Alternately one can go the H77 ITX route and get all the Z77 goodies except for overclocking, for around $30 less than the cheapest Z77 ITX. I think $30 more than H61 is reasonable for those extra features, plus guaranteed out-of-the-box BIOS support for Ivy Bridge.

    I do agree with your (mike_b) first post regarding the choice of CPU used. Ian Cutress, didn't you have a spare K CPU laying around? There are so many people building overclocked ITX rigs these days. I did in a Silverstone SG05 with low profile air cooler to hit 4.2GHz. Plenty of others use the Bitfenix Prodigy and liquid cooling to hit clocks normally reserved for ATX rigs. Another review site (Tweaktown) tested overclocking on Z77 ITX boards and the ASRock hit near 4.8GHz. THAT'S what I want to see.

    Of course this AnandTech roundup has some very useful information too, such as DPC latency tests and POST times. Keep up the good work there! But please, know your audience. Next time if the board is supposed to be overclockable, test that feature.

    Maybe there can be a companion article about overclocking and heatsink clearance? Would be a shame to not overclock this nice collection of Z77 ITX boards.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now