Motherboards Memory Storage Cases/Cooling/PSUs IT Computing Displays Mobile Mac CPUs & Chipsets Video Digital Cameras Linux Gadgets Systems Trade Shows Guides Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
The SSD Anthology: Understanding SSDs and New Drives from OCZ
The SSD Anthology: Understanding SSDs and New Drives from OCZ
Date: March 18th, 2009
Topic: Storage
Manufacturer: Various
Author: Anand Lal Shimpi
Buy the Kingston SNM225-S2/160GB 160GB
Blank
 Buy.com $469.99
 
 

The Trim Command: Coming Soon to a Drive Near You

We run into these problems primarily because the drive doesn’t know when a file is deleted, only when one is overwritten. Thus we lose performance when we go to write a new file at the expense of maintaining lightning quick deletion speeds. The latter doesn’t really matter though, now does it?

There’s a command you may have heard of called TRIM. The command would require proper OS and drive support, but with it you could effectively let the OS tell the SSD to wipe invalid pages before they are overwritten.

The process works like this:

First, a TRIM-supporting OS (e.g. Windows 7 will support TRIM at some point) queries the hard drive for its rotational speed. If the drive responds by saying 0, the OS knows it’s a SSD and turns off features like defrag. It also enables the use of the TRIM command.

When you delete a file, the OS sends a trim command for the LBAs covered by the file to the SSD controller. The controller will then copy the block to cache, wipe the deleted pages, and write the new block with freshly cleaned pages to the drive.

Now when you go to write a file to that block you’ve got empty pages to write to and your write performance will be closer to what it should be.

In our example from earlier, here’s what would happen if our OS and drive supported TRIM:

Our user saves his 4KB text file, which gets put in a new page on a fresh drive. No differences here.

Next was a 8KB JPEG. Two pages allocated; again, no differences.

The third step was deleting the original 4KB text file. Since our drive now supports TRIM, when this deletion request comes down the drive will actually read the entire block, remove the first LBA and write the new block back to the flash:


The TRIM command forces the block to be cleaned before our final write. There's additional overhead but it happens after a delete and not during a critical write.

Our drive is now at 40% capacity, just like the OS thinks it is. When our user goes to save his 12KB JPEG, the write goes at full speed. Problem solved. Well, sorta.

While the TRIM command will alleviate the problem, it won’t eliminate it. The TRIM command can’t be invoked when you’re simply overwriting a file, for example when you save changes to a document. In those situations you’ll still have to pay the performance penalty.

Every controller manufacturer I’ve talked to intends on supporting TRIM whenever there’s an OS that takes advantage of it. The big unknown is whether or not current drives will be firmware-upgradeable to supporting TRIM as no manufacturer has a clear firmware upgrade strategy at this point.

I expect that whenever Windows 7 supports TRIM we’ll see a new generation of drives with support for the command. Whether or not existing drives will be upgraded remains to be seen, but I’d highly encourage it.

To the manufacturers making these drives: your customers buying them today at exorbitant prices deserve your utmost support. If it’s possible to enable TRIM on existing hardware, you owe it to them to offer the upgrade. Their gratitude would most likely be expressed by continuing to purchase SSDs and encouraging others to do so as well. Upset them, and you’ll simply be delaying the migration to solid state storage.

Restoring Your Drive to Peak Performance   Next Page

 
  Index

Tools Share
Find lowest prices Find the lowest prices
Digg   del.icio.us   E-mail  
Print This Article Print this article  

233 Comments - Last by rree, 33 days ago
Username:
Password:
Excellent article by FishTankX, 328 days ago
Good info. However, I noticed one mistake.

Second page
Samsung had a MLC controller at the time but it was too expensive than what SuperTalent was shooting for.

Reply
RE: Excellent article by FishTankX, 328 days ago
That should have bolded "too"

Reply
RE: Excellent article by FishTankX, 328 days ago
Also, I think the velociraptor vs X-25 figures are swapped. 6 odd ms for the intel drive and 0.11ms for the velociraptor..

Reply
RE: Excellent article by Natfly, 327 days ago
RE: Excellent article by Spoelie, 328 days ago
Second page as well:

missing charts before and after this paragraph:

"The chart above shows how much faster these affordable MLC SSDs were than the fastest 3.5” hard drive in sequential transfers. But now look at random write performance:"

Reply
RE: Excellent article by Spoelie, 328 days ago
third page, first table, first column: SSD and HDD entries are switched

Reply
RE: Excellent article by Spoelie, 328 days ago
page 19: I’d never reviewed it
'd & -ed?

Reply
RE: Excellent article by HolyFire, 327 days ago
"I'd never reviewed it" is correct. "I'd" here means "I had", it's Past Perfect tense.

Reply
RE: Excellent article by Spoelie, 327 days ago
chart 1 on page 2 now shows sequential read but the paragraph is changed to mention random read ;)

page 21: As far as I know, this is THE one of THE only reviews

Some very surprising benchmark results for the ocz vertex, I thought the new firmware tanked sequential read speeds (to 80-90) based on the explanation beforehand, but not according to the actual graphs.

Reply
RE: Excellent article by jay401, 327 days ago
yeah, he wants "more expensive than" or "too expensive for".

Reply
Comments Page 1 of 24

DOWNLOAD vWire Today - FREE TRIAL
Take Control of Your Virtual Infrastructure. Manage VI Data & Prevent Problems.
Instantly Recover Active Directory
Instantly recover Active Directory without rebooting, panic or stress. Try FREE!
Report Unlicensed Business Software Use
Earn Up to $1 Million by Reporting Unlicensed Software Use. Fill Out Our Form!
Special Offer from The Economist
Get 12 issues of The Economist for $12. US subscribers only.
Supermicro Barebone Servers
We Carry Everything Supermicro. Low Price, Top Service, FREE Shipping, and more.




Latest news by
DailyTech

 February 9, 2010

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank

 February 8, 2010

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank


more Storage Discussions



pipeboost
Copyright © 1997-2010 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information