Motherboards Memory Storage Cases/Cooling/PSUs IT Computing Displays Mobile Mac CPUs & Chipsets Video Digital Cameras Linux Gadgets Systems Trade Shows Guides Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
UPDATED Half-Life 2: Episode 2 CPU and Graphics Performance
UPDATED Half-Life 2: Episode 2 CPU and Graphics Performance
Date: October 12th, 2007
Topic: Video Card
Manufacturer: Various
Author: Anand Lal Shimpi & Derek Wilson
Buy the Intel BX80571E5200 E5200 2.5GHz
Blank
 Newegg $64.50
 CircuitCity $69.99
 TigerDirect $69.99
 
 

Introduction

At the end of 2004, barely over 6 years since the release of the original Half Life, Valve unleashed the long awaited sequel upon the world. We stayed up late that launch night benchmarking the new game, worried that it would only run well on ATI cards, we were pleasantly surprised that Valve had made a Half Life 2 that ran very well on virtually all hardware with the exception of the GeForce FX.

A year and a half later, Valve brought out Episode One, an attempt at episodic content that was supposed to guarantee quicker game releases, more frequent updates to the story and a better overall experience for gamers. Performance changed a bit with the release of Episode One and its associated version of Valve's Source engine, and the game quickly became a regular part of our CPU and GPU test suites.

Once more, around a year and a half later, Valve finally released Episode Two, the second installment in the Half Life 2 episodic series. Armed with the latest version of the Source engine, we went to town on benchmarking the new game to see where things have changed, if at all.

Our experiences with Half Life 2 and Episode One kept expectations realistic this time around; Valve has historically sacrificed overall image quality in order to maintain playability on even the slowest hardware. What you'll see here today is that every single component we tested, down to the cheapest CPU and GPU, are more than enough to run Half Life 2: Episode Two. Of course having a faster CPU will allow you to extract more performance out of faster GPUs, and faster graphics cards give you the ability to run at higher resolutions, but the minimum requirements for playability are more than reasonable for any modern day system.

For those of you interested, we are offering our demo files for download so you can compare your own systems. The demos are zipped up here: athl2ep2.zip.
The Test and CPU Performance   Next Page

 
  Index

Tools Share
Find lowest prices Find the lowest prices
Digg   del.icio.us   E-mail  
Print This Article Print this article  

46 Comments - Last by tonrav, 798 days ago
Username:
Password:
... by shabby, 850 days ago
Wow that 2900xt just tanks when you enable aa, bummer.

Reply
RE: ... by Spartan Niner, 846 days ago
Last time I checked, the 2900XT doesn't scale as nicely with AA as 8800 series cards do. Also, the resolutions tested and the cards used in this comparison are far from what mainstream gamers use... the CPU comparisons are also nice but shouldn't be the main focus. The results basically tell us more expensive CPUs give better stock performance...

At the very least, a test utilizing more common resolutions 1600x1200, 1280x1024, 1024x768 for 4:3 and resolutions such as 1680x1050 and 1440x900 for the widescreen crowd combined with the usage of X1xxx-series ATI cards and 7xxx nVidia cards would be more realistic.

For reference, I use a E2140 @ 2.4GHz and an X850 XT video card and run CS/DOD Source at max everything, 4xAA. At least for my needs it seems like any video card short of a 8800 series card or a 2900 series card is not a cost-effective upgrade when mid-range cards don't offer that much of a performance boost over my X850...

Reply
Screenshots by redfirebird15, 850 days ago
Can you post screenshots comparing the AA enabled to the non-AA enabled tests? Just wondering if the increase image quality compares with the impact on performance. Thanks!

Oh and could you post results for a 1900xtx? It may be older but the cost of upgrading hasn't been justified yet.

Reply
F*uck Steam by steamsucks, 850 days ago
Steam sucks. You can't even dl the piece of crap game because of server issues. Don't buy this game, and don't support Valve/Steam.

Reply
RE: F*uck Steam by cmdrdredd, 850 days ago
You're just a moron then. Steam works fine, the game is fine, Valve did a good job.

Everyone knows that the HD2900XT does pretty poorly at high resolutions with AA. Every game is like this. To be surprised means you weren't paying attention

Reply
RE: F*uck Steam by RamarC, 850 days ago
what a twit. hundreds of thousands of satisfied users, but he can't get it to work so it must be a piece of crap. go play your ds... even six year olds can handle those.

Reply
RE: F*uck Steam by retrospooty, 850 days ago
I have never had an issue with steam, using it since HL2 first came out. Not sure what your issues are, but you might want to look into them.

Reply
RE: F*uck Steam by sc3252, 848 days ago
Steam does suck. I wish I didnt have to use steam to play orange box, but thats how things work. I dislike it but acknwolege its not as bad as bioshocks drm.

The first thing I did when I bought this game was put it on a seperate account, so that my brother can play counter strike while I play team fortress 2.

As far as performance goes, I am gaming on a 3000+ amd 64 with a 7600gt. Everything plays perfectly at 1680x1050. I have aa turned off but everything else is turned up. I cant say the same for the ut3, or any other modern game that has graphics even close to half-life 2's level.

Reply
RE: F*uck Steam by Zak, 820 days ago
I never had any issues with Steam since HL2 release. I actually like the idea of not having to deal with copy-protected CDs and "please insert CD number 5" every time I want to play a game and having my games always updated. I buy a game in the evening and next day it's INSTALLED and ready on my hard drive. I can make fully re-installable backups of any Steam content on a hard drive so I don't have re-download the whole games when I need to reinstall. I only wish they discounted the Steam games more than the actual physical products. Other than that Steam is a great idea IMHO.

Z.

Reply
Multi-core support by tonjohn, 850 days ago
This article claims that the new engine only takes advantage of two cores. However, Valve's comments all suggest that the engine can take advantage of four or more cores.

As for proof, this is what one of my co-workers from Valve's forums reports:
"How about this?!

http://i24.tinypic.com/rvefs6.png

I was in the level called "our mutual fiend" where you go down into the depths to find out what is going on. Multiple hunters and all kinds of activity going on. I'm going to run this same level with graphical settings all on low to eliminate GPU bottlenecks and set the core affinity for HL2 to use one, then two, then three and then four and record the fps in game."

Reply
Comments Page 1 of 5

Deliver Rich Interactive Experiences
Engage more viewers with Adobe® Flash® Media Interactive Server 3.5
Vinpower DVD Duplicator
Manufacturer of quality disc duplication systems. Drop shipping available. Become a reseller today.
Unlicensed Software at Your Last Company
Anonymously Report Unlicensed Software with Our Form Now. Get Up to $1 Million.
Special Offer from The Economist
Get 12 issues of The Economist for $12. US subscribers only.
Unlicensed Software at Your Last Company
Anonymously Report Unlicensed Software with Our Form Now. Get Up to $1 Million.




Latest news by
DailyTech

 February 9, 2010

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank

 February 8, 2010

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank


more Video Card Discussions



pipeboost
Copyright © 1997-2010 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information