We had a significant amount of requests for Flight Simulator X results in our Core i5/i7 and P55 coverage. I was able to run some quick comparison results between the Bloomfield and Lynnfield platforms last night to answer most of the email and comments requests. However, I am still running the Phenom II and Core 2 Quad benches. I do not know if we will be able to have those results in our P55 roundups that start in a couple of days. If not, I will follow up with these particular performance updates in another blog.

Test Setup-



We are utilizing our standard P55/X58 setups for this test. The 920/860/870 platforms are using 7-7-7-20 1T DDR3-1600 memory configurations. The 750 platform is running at DDR3-1333 with 6-6-6-18 1T timings since the 12x multiplier is not available on the i5/750. The X58 platform is equipped with 6GB of memory and the P55 with 8GB. Turbo mode and Hyper-Threading is enabled as designed and shipped from Intel. All other BIOS settings are at stock ratios.



We enabled DX10, AA/AF, set the Aircraft, Scenery, Weather, and Traffic sliders to Ultra High, and then measured a pre-recorded six minute flight around Honolulu with FRAPS at 1920x1080. Our variability with this benchmark averages around 0.5%. The benchmark is run five times with the median score reported for our results. FSX responds well to both increases in GPU and CPU improvements, but especially differences in CPU clock speeds.


Gaming Performance - Flight Simulator X

When overclocked to 4.2GHz, the 920 and 860 are basically even in this title. The big differences though are the improvements in frame rates, especially the minimum frame rate with a 36% increase compared to the stock 860/870 results. The average frame rates increase 14~21% over the 860/870 stock results.

Due to very aggressive turbo modes, the 860/870 offer the best performance at stock clock settings. No real surprise there, but the improved turbo mode on the i5/750 does allow it to stay even with the i7/920 in this title. All of the processors offered a very enjoyable gaming experience as minimum frame rates were excellent, especially when the processors were overclocked. For those originally wondering, the i5/750-P55 combination will not have any problems running this title at 1920x1080 resolutions with Ultra High quality settings.


Gallery: P55 / FSX

OCZ Technology

OCZ recently sent us their upcoming DDR3-2400 C9 4GB Blade series kit. The official specifications call for 9-10-9-24 1T timings at 1.65V VDimm on the P55 platform. We tossed it in our Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2 motherboard with an i7-870 overclocked to 4.2GHz (21x200), set the memory multiplier to 12x for 2400MHz on the memory, and manually set timings to 9-10-9-24 1T, VDimm to 1.65V, VCore to 1.375V, and VTT to 1.370V.





The OCZ DDR3-2400 Blade kit worked perfectly at its rated specifications on one of the least expensive P55 boards you can purchase. We will have further results shortly.


Gallery: OCZ DDR3-2400

TankGuys

I normally do not do this, but we were needing a couple i7/860 processors plus a few additional Intel G2 80GB SSD drives quickly for the 860 review and for the expanded motherboard test suite. Normally, we would go to the larger e-tailers like Newegg or others for these items. Well, I was not satisfied with the pricing or availability on either item, so I hit up Ben at TankGuys to see what he could do for us.

Let's just that TankGuys came through with flying colors. Not only did they ship the items before Newegg had them in stock, but their prices were extremely competitive. We spent $269.99 for our i7/860 compared to $299.99 ($289.99 today) at Newegg. Also,the Intel X25-M G2 80GB SSD was $349.99 at Newegg ($309.99 today) compared to $269.99 at TankGuys when we placed our orders. So, it does pay to shop around and sometimes the smaller guys might just be able to offer better prices than the large resellers.

Comments Locked

40 Comments

View All Comments

  • maomao0000 - Sunday, October 11, 2009 - link

    http://www.myyshop.com">http://www.myyshop.com

    Quality is our Dignity; Service is our Lift.

    Myyshop.com commodity is credit guarantee, you can rest assured of purchase, myyshop will

    provide service for you all, welcome to myyshop.com

    Air Jordan 7 Retro Size 10 Blk/Red Raptor - $34

    100% Authentic Brand New in Box DS Air Jordan 7 Retro Raptor colorway

    Never Worn, only been tried on the day I bought them back in 2002

    $35Firm; no trades

    http://www.myyshop.com/productlist.asp?id=s14">http://www.myyshop.com/productlist.asp?id=s14 (Jordan)

    http://www.myyshop.com/productlist.asp?id=s29">http://www.myyshop.com/productlist.asp?id=s29 (Nike shox)
  • zentrope - Tuesday, October 6, 2009 - link

    the testing is being done for dual channel..just try it with DDR3 triple channel and that too OC...
    i just want to see to what extent it can go..
    i have used OCZ DDR2 800mhz dual channel and its performance is awesome..
    i have oc it to 1300mhz without any effort..
    my friend is using corsair and gskill and we keep on testing the limit of our memory sticks..:-)
  • SIDEKICKUBT - Monday, October 5, 2009 - link

    Gary,

    with FSX being CPU hungry, did you notice any issues with textures not loading fast enough causing blurry textures (low mip-maps)? I'm thinking 737 nor Cessna test flights here.

    Tim
  • bigdog1984 - Wednesday, September 30, 2009 - link

    Hey Gary,

    Any idea about how the 5870 performs in FSX with 2 or 3 monitors? I know this might not be common but with Eyefinity this type of game is perfect for a 3 monitor setup.
  • iRiKi - Sunday, October 18, 2009 - link

    *DELETE THE SPAMMOR* :EE

    I agree with bigdog, the ATI5870's Eyefinity is just _PERFECT_ for FSX, but we all know the perf hit over NV cards.. a roundup over the two cards (and more FSX+CPU benchs!!) would be absolutely amazing for us, lotsammoneyinvolved-simmers.

    Thank you very much for this benchmark, even not using a payware aircraft this is _ONLY_ benchmark in the entire interweb's comparing i7 920, 860 and 750... thank you SO much! :D
  • swing848 - Monday, September 28, 2009 - link

    You now have results for an Nvidia card, can you run the same tests with an ATI HD5870 video card?

    ATI has always been behind Nvidia in FSX benchmarks, the HD5870 would be an interesting discussion because it has become wildly popular as it is, on average, on par with the HD4870 X2 and Nvidia's 295 in a great many games other than FSX.

    Thank you.
  • nipplefish - Friday, September 25, 2009 - link

    Bought several of the parts for my current system, which I built right when Core 2 Duo was released... TankGuys had the best prices of anyone and it was about 2 days between order placement and receipt. Responded fast to an email I sent also. I'll definitely look at them again when it's time for a new rig.
  • PhilTaylor - Wednesday, September 23, 2009 - link

    You upgraded FSX to SP1 to get multi-core support?

    And used SP2 to get additional optimizations? And D3D10, or it was D3D9?

    FPS should be tested for a review like this with frame rate unlimited and not locked. a mistake I often see.
  • Gary Key - Thursday, September 24, 2009 - link

    Actually I tested with the Acceleration add-in pack which contains both service packs along with DX10 being enabled as stated. The gallery contains screenshots of the options selected in FSX, frame rate was set to unlimited.
  • mhzguy - Thursday, September 24, 2009 - link

    Great blog! the big whole that needs to be filled is the PH II results, hope you can follow up really soon before we make purchase.

    Again really nice work and thanks for taking the time to do this.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now