...the new site is shaping up. As I promised before, we've implemented a number of changes to the new site and I honestly think they are for the better. But before I talk about the new changes, let me talk about where the idea for the new site came from:

We had some pretty big meetings here at AT a couple weeks back and one thing to discuss was the site layout and what we felt it needed.

One thing we noticed when looking at the old site was that although we were displaying tons of articles on the front page, very few people scrolled down and clicked on the last review being displayed on the front page. In fact, after a review had gone below the 3rd position on the front page it hardly received any attention.

The next thing we noticed was that once an article fell off of the front page, it was very difficult to get to. You either had to go to the section that the article was located in (e.g. CPUs) and hope it was still on that front page, or try and remember the name of the article to search for it.

So what we had was a site layout that was great for daily readers, and great for finding fairly recent articles if you wanted to find anything else you were left with the search engine and that's all. This is where the AnandTech Product Coverage section was born from, and we kept it at the bottom half of the page so that the focus would still be on the latest reviews.

Then we thought that we wanted people to use the Product Coverage section so we tried to keep it at least somewhat visible by compressing the latest reviews area of the site. We ended up making a mistake here in that we were too aggressive in cutting the number of reviews listed with images/descriptions down to 2. We relied a bit too much on the text links to the right to make up for it, and have since reversed a bit of the decision. Now we display 5 articles to the left, and still display 8 to the right, so we're actually displaying more content on the front page and it's done in an even smaller area than with the old site - but I think it works now that we've tweaked it a bit.

The next thing was that we wanted to make room for what we finally decided to call AnandTech Insider stories. These articles are quick little 1 - 2 pagers that are usually verbally confirmed rumors, etc... that we get from our sources on products and technology that haven't been officially launched yet. The problem with these stories was that we would sometimes have 3 of them in a week, meaning that they would push the reviews far down the page, cannibalizing the attention those reviews got. Our solution was to separate them into a section of their own, and since we've added dates to the review/story titles now you should have a better idea of what's new and what's not.

Another huge motivation for us was page size; even on broadband the old site would take a bit longer to load than I liked, but now the thing just flies. We have pulled the news off of the front page, but the headlines are still there and you can go directly to the news page if you'd like to see a listing of all of the news in an easy to scroll-thru fashion.

The added color and tweaked graphics were just things to complete the package and everyone is entitled to their own opinions about them. We've tweaked the graphics a bit in response to reader comments (as well as the rest of the design which should be evident by now) and I think they look even better now.

When we launched it I liked the new site better than the old one, but with your comments I'm now loving it a lot more. We are still tweaking a bit but I think we've nailed the major things. Jason (the man responsible for the code behind the new design) and I both take every single comment to heart (as positive or as harsh as it may be) which is something I hope is quite evident by the quick turnaround on the design changes that you've seen here.

A big internal motivation for the new design was to move to a much improved web architecture, something that Jason will be talking about in greater detail in a Behind AnandTech article. AnandTech (the main site at least) is now running on a Microsoft .NET platform and the site is faster than ever. Although the site may look familiar, the entire web architecture has been re-done and re-written and it's pretty impressive if I do say so myself. We haven't scheduled Jason's article about the site's architecture yet, but I'll be sure to let you all know when I have a better idea of when it'll go live.

That's about it for now, I'm working on the Hitachi Deskstar 7K400 (400GB) review which is currently scheduled to go up on Saturday. So far everything's going well so you should expect that review this weekend.

Take care :)
Comments Locked

111 Comments

View All Comments

  • Chuck - Wednesday, August 4, 2004 - link

    I read AT at work (behind a big telecom company's firewall) during the day.

    Since the change I can only get successful pageloads on AT about 1 in 20 tries. Since my browser hasn't changed and the firewall is not blacklisting the site ("Forbidden by rating check"), then some of the new site code must be interpreted as threatening in some manner.

    Sorry guys. Now I get blank page after blank page so it's just not worth it anymore. I don't experience this problem with any other site (THG, FS, HOCP, INQ, Blues News, etc).

    Love the site. Hope you continue to do well in the future.
  • Cliff - Monday, August 2, 2004 - link

    i'm about to give up on checking this blog...coming up on a month without an update...
  • GhandiInstinct - Sunday, August 1, 2004 - link

    Anand, I'd really appreciate some "CPU run-down, comparison" article. With all these new CPUs and Intel having trouble. Which is the best for me?
  • TheShniz - Thursday, July 29, 2004 - link

    It C'ms like your Forums isn't integrating w/ the new WebSite template/layout properly. Pleaz check my newly created Username (TheShniz) 4 error reports.
  • Rob - Tuesday, July 27, 2004 - link

    Yeah, it's about darn time for another blog.
  • Anonymous - Sunday, July 25, 2004 - link

    #104: AnandTech generates over 1 Million dollars per year in advertising revenue. I know this becuase I read Anand's interviews at a site that I can't remember the name of anymore. :-(

    I think 1 Million dollars are good enough to hire 15 paid editors. Besides, if it wasn't for these 15 paid editors you wouldn't be able to read a new article every single day (it doens't matter if you read every single or not).

    I agree that blinking ads are annoying, but I think it is out of Anand's hand to re-do the graphics for the advertisements. Maybe these companies would get more clicks if the graphics are tame and light, BUT apparently blinking graphics = more attention by the reader = more clicks.

    That's how it works. :-(
  • Dasterdly - Sunday, July 25, 2004 - link

    If the adds were more intelligent and less "bling bling" then it would be tolerable.
    If there are 15 paid editors thats way too many for even annoying ads to pay for.
  • Anonymous - Sunday, July 25, 2004 - link

    #101: Deal with it. We all know that AnandTech needs ads to survive. AnandTech probably has 15 different PAID editors and they wouldn't be here if Anand wasn't paying them. You enjoy AnandTech's articles and reviews, so why don't you learn to deal with them.

    I am sure your eyes aren't that sensitive that you can't handle a few ads.
  • Anonymous - Sunday, July 25, 2004 - link

    I agree with AdamK. As much busy as he may be, he still does one review per week. And if he has time to do a review, he can at leat take 10 minutes off and do a blog post. Maybe inform us that he won't be able to update his blog for a time as he is doing something important.

    Chill out man! I know weddings are tough due to the amount of work involved, but just because you have a wedding doens't mean you can't do anything else beside thinking about the wedding.

    Think like this - what if had a job where he worked for some company. The company wasn't gonna give him 2 months off just because his wedding is coming up. He may very well had to work till the very last day.

    Chill out man!
  • Dasterdly - Sunday, July 25, 2004 - link

    Yes the flashing kiddie adds are very lame, 3 of the exact same zip zoom fly adds is totally lame.
    Reminds me of web sites from the early 90's when everyone had animated gifs all over thier sites.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now