If we'd never heard the name Sandy, we'd have featured two live blogs today, and had a few hours to spend with the latest members of the Nexus family. Sadly, Google's event was canceled and so we're left with press images and specifications. But that doesn't mean there isn't plenty to discuss, so let's get started. 

The Nexus 4

The Nexus program has always had three components: a platform, an OEM and new software. The platform is the SoC and other internal hardware components that define the performance characteristics Google would like to see all manufacturers pursue. The OEM partner works with Google in design and features, and, of course, manufacturing and packaging. At times the platform and OEM have fit hand in glove, with the platform and design hewn from an existing product. We saw this in the Nexus One, which mirrored the hardware HTC was offering in the Droid Incredible and several other models. We saw this again with the Nexus S, which was strikingly similar to Samsung's Galaxy S, within and without. The Galaxy Nexus was a strange departure, owing its internals to a platform preferred by Motorola, but with a design that foretold Samsung's next iteration of the Galaxy S family. And now, there's the Nexus 4, which could have easily been called the Optimus Nexus or the Nexus G, were it not for Google finding a nomenclature they liked. 

Looking at the LG Optimus G's spec sheet alongside that of the Nexus 4 could leave one a bit bemused at how little has really changed. The same SoC, RAM, display, connectivity and battery configuration are shared by both devices. The Nexus 4 adds wireless charging, and wireless display courtesy of the Miracast standard. The design is familiar, but distinct; taking the hard lines of the rather square Optimus and softening them to form the Nexus. But much of the distinction comes in two key areas: price and software.

Nexus 4 and LG Optimus G Comparison
Device Nexus 4 LG Optimus G
SoC 1.5 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro
(APQ8064: 4 x Krait + Adreno 320)
1.5 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro
(APQ8064: 4 x Krait + Adreno 320)
RAM/NAND/Expansion 2 GB LPDDR2, 8/16 GB NAND, no microSD 2 GB LPDDR2, 16 GB NAND, 16 GB microSD
Display 4.7" WXGA TrueHD IPS Plus (1280x768) with In-Cell Touch 4.7" WXGA TrueHD IPS Plus (1280x768) with In-Cell Touch
Network Pentaband 2G / 3G (Uncertain baseband) 2G / 3G / 4G LTE (Qualcomm MDM9615 UE Category 3 LTE)
Dimensions 133.9mm x 68.7mm x 9.1mm, 139 grams 131.9mm x 68.9mm x 8.45mm, 145 grams
Camera 8.0 MP Rear Facing, 1.3 MP Front Facing 13.0 MP or 8.0 MP Rear Facing, 1.3 MP Front Facing
Battery 2100 mAh 3.8V (7.98 Whr) 2100 mAh 3.8V (7.98 Whr)
OS Android 4.2 Android 4.0.x
Connectivity 802.11b/g/n + BT 4.0, USB2.0, GPS/GNSS, MHL, DLNA, NFC, Miracast wireless display 802.11b/g/n + BT 4.0, USB2.0, GPS/GNSS, MHL, DLNA, NFC

In lieu of a drastic overhaul of Jelly Bean, this point advance refines various features we've already seen. Photo Sphere expands the panorama function to generate a composite that includes frames in multiple axes, resulting in an image similar to those you find in Google's Street View. A new text input option comes with Gesture Typing, which mimics Swype's mechanism of having the user glide their finger between target letters. Miracast is enabled with the update, which serves as an answer to Apple's AirPlay, though the ubiquity of Apple TV trumps that of Miracast-enabled displays. Quick Actions for Notifications and Google Now have been expanded and the Google Search results are now graced by their Knowledge Graph. LG will certainly work to have Android 4.2 ready for their Optimus G, before too long, but the Nexus 4's present exclusivity, and promise of future updates gives it an edge. 

Then there's price. The Nexus One premiered with impressive specs for the time and was a shot across the bow by Google against the US carriers. By tying us to lengthy contracts, US carriers maintain all of the agency for device selection, pricing and software bloat. By offering a halo phone from their own store, and selling it unlocked, Google offered an alternative. There were a few problems, though, with the price chief among them. At $529 off-contract, the Nexus One was priced similarly to other off-contract devices, but was far in excess of what consumers typically spend on even high-end devices. So, the experiment was a bit of a failure, with most off-contract buyers being enthusiasts and technophiles. 

The LG Optimus G is available through AT&T off-contract for an oddly familiar $549, while the Nexus 4 sheds $250 from the price along with 8 GB of NAND and the microSD slot. We'll refrain from making a to-do about the storage limitations, and focus on the unprecedented value that this device offers. And this makes it the shot across the bow for which the Nexus One was intended. But there's a different cost: LTE.

The GSM/HSPA networks that dominate internationally, and are featured here with AT&T and T-Mobile, offer interoperability across certain limited bands. The result is that a pentaband device can operate on nearly any GSM/HSPA network in the world. LTE interoperability is a rat's nest that may never be solved. Many more bands can be utilized and for those carrier's with legacy CDMA networks there remains a certification process that must be undergone by new hardware and software. The result is that no one device would operate on the panoply of networks in the US alone, and couldn't operate on several of them at all without direct involvement by the carriers. So, in order to maintain independence from the carrier taint, Google omits LTE and foregoes CDMA2000 networks like Verizon or Sprint. 

Does lacking the most modern air interface make this a lame duck? That's for you to decide. This remains the highest bang for your buck we've seen in an off-contract phone. At least on paper. We'll see how things look for sure in the review. 

The Nexus 10

Samsung's involvement in the second Nexus tablet comes at an interesting time in the Android tablet market. The iPad's success persists like a runaway freight train; updated hardware and a new form factor seem almost superfluous to the knowledge that the iPad will sell millions of units before the holidays. Despite previously flagging sales and market enthusiasm, the Nexus 7 and Kindle Fire demonstrated that there's life in the Android tablet market. So, with portability and affordability seemingly of paramount concern to tablet buyers, what's the place of a high-end, 10" tablet? 

The Nexus 10 marries the highest resolution display found on any tablet, with the latest CPU and GPU from ARM's design works. The SoC is the long awaited Exynos 5 Dual, the first with ARM's Cortex-A15 cores, and Mali-T604 GPU. Anand's been chugging away at the review for the most recent Chromebook, the first device to feature the Exynos 5 Dual, and will dig deep into the performance of the hardware, so we'll save plenty for that. I will mention again, though, that one of the key features of the SoC is the enormous memory bandwidth. 

When Apple introduced the Retina display on the iPad (early 2012) we explored the importance of memory bandwidth to be able to generate all those pixels at a high frame rate. For Apple the solution in the A5X was to develop a configuration of four 32-bit channels connected to LP-DDR2 memory with a 400 MHz clock. The resulting bandwidth was an impressive 12.8 GB/s. The Exynos 5 Dual matches that figure, but does so with half the channels at twice the clocks while utilizing low-voltage DDR3 memory (2x32bit @800 MHz). 

Where the Nexus 10 matches the iPad for memory bandwidth, it exceeds it in resolution. There was a time not so long ago that resolutions of 2560x1600 (WQXGA) were the stuff of 27" and 30" monitors, intended for workstations and gaming enthusiasts. As of November 13th, though, you'll find it in a 10" tablet weighing in at under two-thirds of a kilogram. We're sticklers for waiting till we've dissected things before we sing their praises, but historically, Samsung's done good things with these PLS devices in their tablets. 

Android 4.2 is on board, with a few tweaks for the tablet set. A new multi-user option will allow multiple people to share a tablet with each user given their own configuration and data. It will be interesting to see the way this is implemented, how resources and storage are shared amongst users, how apps common to multiple users are handled. 

With so much performance and so many pixels on hand, the Nexus 10 is a clear grab for iPad sales. Whether it sees success similar to the Nexus 7 may depend in part on pricing. At $399 for the 16 GB model, and $499 for the 32 GB model, the Nexus 10 undercuts the iPad by $100 across the board. Does that price make the Nexus 10 a clear recommendation of the recently updated iPad? We'll have to wait and see. 

POST A COMMENT

102 Comments

View All Comments

  • Rickschwar - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    I agree the lack of a memory slot for both the iPad and Nexus is a big deal. That's why smart users will purchase the 32GB model.

    I talked to someone with connections inside Google and found out the reason Google is doing this is because they think the Cloud is where data should be stored. Of course that doesn't work out well when you're away from Wi-Fi.

    - Rick
    Reply
  • Filiprino - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    Well, the data shouldn't be stored on the cloud. Some data maybe, but not the data, all your data.

    The cloud is not under your control, and one thing is my e-mail and other thing are my backups, photos, apps, videos, music and the rest.

    Give me 16 TB for my room and the cloud can go direct to the trash.
    Reply
  • OCedHrt - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    Why? I have an unlimited data plan with no caps. Reply
  • darwinosx - Saturday, November 17, 2012 - link

    It's not a big deal because most people will never use one.
    Also Google knows that using an SD card with android apps and data is a mess. Thats why they discourage them and never put them on Nexus devices.
    16GB is enough for most people who use cloud services and don't load up their tablets with apps or data they don't use.
    Reply
  • darwinosx - Saturday, November 17, 2012 - link

    Google had nothing to do with that. Its how the Android handset market is shaking out. Google just does what the carriers allow them to. In the case of the Nexus 4 the carriers did not allow Google to have LTE. Google rolled over for the carriers like they always. Android users are the product not the customer so Google doesn't care. Just view or ads and let us track your movements and sell the information. Reply
  • harshbarj - Wednesday, October 31, 2012 - link

    "Apple has sold more iPads than any other manufacturer"

    To be 100% accurate apple is the ONLY company selling iPads.

    You also are very quick calling something a strength or weakness when it could be argued either way. Calling a physical home button a strength and the lack of one a weakness is very much opinion. Also the new "Lightning connector" is viewed by many as a weakness as it now makes all old devices obsolete and many will not work with this new connector even with an adapter.
    Reply
  • Rickschwar - Sunday, November 04, 2012 - link

    True. I fixed the typo you pointed out.

    - Rick
    Reply
  • Fiercé - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    ...no LTE? Damn.

    Personally, I think the value is still there with the device being the vanguard of the hardware and software it packs inside. I'm just not sure that horsepower and smooth UI refinement will resonate enough with the user who can't get webpages to load quickly or who knows they'd be better served downloading an app over wi-fi rather than out on the road.

    At that price point however, they may just sell a bundle of these regardless. Quite the coin toss.
    Reply
  • dishayu - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    "the user who can't get webpages to load quickly"

    I mean, really? 21 mbps plenty fast to browse on the phone for all practical purposes. I don't like to make statements like X amount of resource is enough for this application, but 21 mbps is FAST!

    I don't know of many web pages that would show significant difference in user experience, it'll take you 1 second or so to download a 3MB page and i don't know too many pages which are that big. Nevermind the fact that the phone itself will take longer to render the page than HSPA+ will take to download it.

    1080p videos can be streamed effortlessly on HSPA+

    The only practical area where LTE makes sense is if you download gigabytes of data on your phone regularly (not many do that because mobile data costs a bomb) or you're using it for tethering purposes with multiple devices (which runs into the same wall).
    Reply
  • web2dot0 - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    Funny how people made fun of iPad when they didn't have LTE.
    I guess LTE isn't that big a deal now I suppose.

    What about microSD? I thought that was a non-starter too.
    I guess not having a microSD slot wasn't such a bad idea too?

    Wait, iPad3/4 got way too many pixels, games will play shitty on it. Totally unecessary.
    I guess it's ok now. I mean Android's screen PPI trumps it, so it's a no brainer!

    You guys are hilarious!
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now