CPU Performance

The state of CPU performance testing under Android is unfortunately still quite broken. We're using a mix of browser based tests with Java & Native apps (AndEBench). 

The key comparisons to look for are the Snapdragon 800 MDP/T vs. the Exynos 5 Octa (4 x ARM Cortex A15s) based Galaxy S 4 (SHVE300S), the Exynos 5 Dual (2 x ARM Cortex A15s) based Nexus 10 tablet and any of the Snapdragon 600 based smartphones (HTC One/T-Mobile Galaxy S 4) running two Krait 300s at 1.7/1.9GHz. 

Browsermark 2.0

Google Octane Benchmark v1

Mozilla Kraken Benchmark - 1.1

SunSpider Javascript Benchmark 1.0 - Stock Browser

Krait 400 seems to do very well against ARM's Cortex A15, trading positions in terms of performance depending on the test. As these are browser based benchmarks there's a big software component to variability that prevents big conclusions from being made here, but it's clear that Snapdragon 800 is in a similar performance class to current Cortex A15 based designs.

Vellamo Benchmark - 2.0

Vellamo Benchmark - 2.0

AndEBench

AndEBench - Java

AndEBench - Native

The Java and Native client AndEBench tests echo what we've seen elsewhere: Snapdragon 800 can definitely be quicker than ARM's Cortex A15, and at least is in a similar class.

Introduction GPU Performance - 3DMark
POST A COMMENT

115 Comments

View All Comments

  • akbisw - Tuesday, June 18, 2013 - link

    YESSS!!! THANK YOU QUALCOMM exactly What I expected!!! Reply
  • Piano Man - Tuesday, June 18, 2013 - link

    Nice performance, but the lack of power utilization benchmarks prevents me from breaking out the party favors for the time being. Reply
  • clemsyn - Tuesday, June 18, 2013 - link

    I agree, power utilization and heat are very important in mobile. Hope this don't come with a fan :) Reply
  • Xilliox - Wednesday, June 19, 2013 - link

    I have been working on this for a long time, trust me, it does not need a fan! Reply
  • FwFred - Tuesday, June 18, 2013 - link

    Comparing phones to a tablet is a bit odd. Glad there was a Nexus 10 at least. Reply
  • kcsween - Wednesday, June 19, 2013 - link

    You all almost sound like this is Qualcomm's first go at making a mobile processor. I'd find it very hard to believe that they'd not take into consideration power consumption and heat or any other negative factors they considered when they made their other chips. Having said that, all that could be out the door in the race bigger and better, who knows. Guess we all will have to wait and see how this things performs in an actual smartphone. Reply
  • arkhamasylum87 - Tuesday, June 18, 2013 - link

    How does this compare to the Ivybridge or Haswell Y series processors in terms of CPU/GPU performance? Would like to see those comparisons. So we can extrapolate how this will compare to a fanless Core product from Intel. The gap is there in terms of connectivity but the perf gaps on CPU/GPU would be interesting to note. Reply
  • teiglin - Tuesday, June 18, 2013 - link

    Ivy Y no longer seems interesting to me but for the moment, Haswell 15W (both HD4600/5000) would be super interesting to add to the "great equalizer" page of charts. Doesn't Anand have an Acer with i7-4500U as well as the MBA with i5-4250U? Demand he run some benchmarks for you so you can update those charts. The comparison to i5-3317U made sense against APQ8064T, but 8974's contemporary is Haswell, not Ivy.

    And when you have Haswell Y samples, those would be neat, too. :)
    Reply
  • jeffkro - Wednesday, June 19, 2013 - link

    15W still requires a fan. Reply
  • sna1970 - Tuesday, July 09, 2013 - link

    not really,

    the Haswell can run from 6 watts up to 15 watts.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now